Posts Tagged ‘Justin Timberlake’

It’s been 15 years since the cult classic Donnie Darko was first released and the world has witnessed some seismic events in between; a litany of wars and conflicts, the financial crash and, of course, the emergence of Kim Kardashian’s derriere. Director Richard Kelly has unleashed two sci fi oddities in that time, but it’s the tale of a troubled teen and a 6ft bunny rabbit that really captured the hearts and minds of a generation (including the editors of this website.) Reflections sat down with Kelly to learn about the new restoration, the perils of Hollywood and the lyricism of Tears for Fears…

What’s it been like revisiting the film after 15 years?

It’s been great. Arrow Films contacted me and they said they wanted to do a 4K restoration. That was music to my ears because the film has never been properly maintained. I was never happy with the transfer, the Blu-ray or any of it. It just never looked right. So they gave us this great resource to go back to the original negative and use all of today’s technology to present the film in a whole new way. It was a lot of work and I had a window of time available with Steven Poster (Donnie Darko’s DoP) to go and do it. It’s great.

When the film first came out it took a little while to take flight. Do you think it caught on in the zeitgeist?

I think it really caught on here (in the UK) for whatever reason. It caught on in the US but not as quickly. When it came over in 2002, I was blown away by the response. I was overwhelmed, it gave me a second wind, you know. I can’t say why it was here. I think maybe it might have something to do with the music being all UK based pop songs. It’s an American story, but it’s universal and it translates into many languages and crosses many cultures. There is something universal about being a teenager and confronting big metaphysical ideas.

You use a lot of musical scenes, was there a big inspiration behind that?

I love incorporating music into my films, and it’s always by design. It’s often planned ahead of time, written into the script, choreographed into the script. The lyrical moments for me are the most cinematic. I always want to protect the lyricism. It’s sometimes a challenge to do because, like that Tears for Fears sequence in the movie, that’s at least two minutes long and no one is speaking dialogue. There’s a lot of story, there’s a lot of narrative in that sequence and it’s completely essential to the film. But when you’re dealing with financiers and with the studio and people want the running time shorter, they’re looking at that and thinking it’s superfluous, self indulgent lyricism and I’m like, ‘That’s why I’m doing this!’ For the lyricism, right? It becomes a real fight to protect this stuff.

How did you know that sequence was particularly precious to you?

From the very beginning. It was written in the script that when they jump out of the bus and Jake’s feet hit the pavement that the piano note begins. I was like, I saw it. That was it. It had to be this way. Like in Southland Tales with Justin Timberlake lip synching to The Killers, and there are all these dancers and he’s got a Budweiser. That guy (Timberlake) saw it. Then you’ve got to convince the producers to let you take a day of filming, when you don’t have the rights to the song and the producers were like, “We don’t have the song, we don’t even know if we can get the song, the song might cost up to $200,000 and this is crazy”. You’ve got to pick your battles, and those are some that I picked.

In all of your films you really portray the dark side of humanity. What draws you to these kinds of films?

I think the first three films that I have made are obviously dealing with some big apocalyptic themes. Literally apocalyptic themes. There is definitely a disturbing confrontation with a lot of dark stuff. For these three films they almost seem like a part of a bigger story. All my films are connected in ways that people don’t completely realise yet. I think they are more compelling stories. I don’t want to only make films that are dark, so to speak. I would love to make films that are more optimistic, that have a happy ending. I am capable of doing that! (laughs). I don’t always plan on killing everyone or blowing up the world. I’m not looking to continue being ‘apocalypse boy’.

How do you feel about the theatrical cut at the moment. Is it important to you that everyone understood how the parallel universe plot worked?

I don’t favour one cut over the other. The Director’s Cut is much more novelistic, sprawling and it’s got a lot more science fiction logic to it. I think both cuts have their virtues and I’m not really satisfied with either of them completely but they are what they are. With this restoration I was really grateful that we were able to go in and make the image look better. There is a lot of people who have never seen this movie on the big screen. It’s a significant improvement.

Re-watching the film I was really intrigued by the Patrick Swayze character. In light of some of the recent high profile sex scandals I wondered if you had any thoughts about his role in the film?

At the time we were trying to satirise the self help (gurus). When we made the film in 2000 there was never really any big high profile sex scandal involving big celebrity or whatever. I think we were just thinking, ‘OK we’re going to deconstruct this self help guy who sort of shows up in the town and is sort of a snake oil salesman’. He’s clearly full of shit and we kind of thought, ‘what could be the worst possible secret or sinister back story for this character?’. OK, well if he’s a child pornographer, let’s go with that. Then it really became just a twist in the movie and he became one of the multiple villains.

In regards to Jake Gyllenhaal’s performance, what were you looking for in Donnie?

I think that you know that a film is connecting if you can’t imagine anyone else in the lead role. It had to be Jake. We both spent a lot of time with the script going through every scene and he would ask me to make adjustments to the dialogue. It was a really delicate, emotional balancing act trying to modulate Donnie’s arc. So yesterday Donnie yelled at his gym teacher, tomorrow he’s going to be burning down a house. We had to map out the timeline to figure out where he was emotionally on every day of shooting and where he would be in the calendar of 28 days. So it was a big undertaking. We had to be very meticulous with mapping it all out.

If you had control over the timeline of your film career would you have liked the success of Donnie Darko to have come a few films later?

Hindsight is always 20/20, you know? I think the order was what it was meant to be. It was not a success until it came to the UK. It was actually a disaster at Sundance, it was a flop in the US. So all the movies take time. You can’t really control the wind. A movie, when it gets released, the wind is either blowing at your front or it’s blowing at your back. You can’t control the wind. I just try to follow my instincts. On the next film we’ve been really careful to make sure all the elements are going to be in place. I hope the wind will be at our back.

Are you going to change to another genre in future?

Yeah. I’m working on a lot of new stuff and I’m going to be moving in a lot of new directions. I don’t ever just want to be repeating myself. I don’t ever want to get complacent or surrender to the marketplace or become cynical. I just want to keep moving forward and exploring new kinds of stories and new ideas. You’re going to see me move in a lot of new directions.

DONNIE DARKO 15th Anniversary 4K Restoration will screen at the BFI from 17th December and in cinemas nationwide from 23rd December. BFI Tickets are on sale now: http://bit.ly/2eww8r3

Read Full Post »

The Coen Bros have always skilfully manoeuvred the lines between popular crowd pleasing fare and intelligent, artful cinema, so it is interesting that for their latest film they have set their eyes upon an individual who resolutely fails to bridge this gap. Set in bohemian 1960’s Greenwich Village, we follow the struggles of one Llewyn Davis, a folk singer who just can’t catch a break. The film has a strong kinship with one of the Coen’s earliest films, Barton Fink. While that film focused on a disillusioned, introspective screenwriter struggling to conform to Hollywood whims, at least the character had some sense of purpose.

Llewyn, played by Oscar Isaac, is a difficult character to like. Sullen, tetchy and self entitled, he trudges across a wintry New York foraging for couches to sleep on at night. One of these couches belongs to Jean (Carey Mulligan) and Jim (Justin Timberlake), two old friends who are now coupled up. Relations between Llewyn and Jean are frosty from an ill advised one night stand and the potential after effects. Meanwhile, Llewyn’s vague attempts to make a go of his solo career are hampered by the need to recover a friends cat that he has haplessly lost.

Inside Llewyn Davis is a meandering, muted affair by the Coen bros standards. They have reined in the bombastic set pieces and the eccentric characters for a more reflective character piece. Llewyn is probably the most elusive and dislikable lead in their canon yet, even in amongst the apathetic stoners, cold blooded killers and petty criminals. At least with them there was some wit and flair – here Llewyn seems like he has given up on his life. There are a few more eccentric moments to warm the palette, in John Goodman’s colourful jazz guru and the humorous travails with the errant cat.

Music obviously plays a huge role in the film. Much has been written about the involvement of T-Bone Burnett and Mumford & Sons (Wait! Come back!), and the folk songs are faithfully recreated on screen. I think without the musical interludes the film would have tested even the most willing viewer; they provide a respite both for Llewyn and the audience. You get the feeling this is all he has to live for, and yet, perhaps I am projecting, the songs are fairly unremarkable to my ears. I wondered if it was a conscious decision by the Coens to demonstrate Llewyn as a run of the mill talent.

Aesthetically the film is beautifully rendered, with Bruno Delbonnel stepping in for their regular DP Roger Deakins. Most of the film is drawn out in sickly browns which adds to the muted tone, yet the night time scenes are deliciously noirish and smoky. As per usual the performances are all on song, with Isaac giving an uncompromisingly grumpy turn as the lead. While we never sympathise with him, there is a sense of empathy. One flaw I did find was in Mulligan’s role as Jean, which seemed mostly one dimensional as the aggressive ex-lover.

Inside Llewyn Davis will go down as one of the Coen bros left turns, where they eschewed any Hollywood thrills for a more personal rumination. It is a hard film to love, withdrawn and melancholic, yet there is something lurking beneath the surface that draws the audience in. Anyone who has ever felt lost or embittered by the choices they have made in life will find kinship with Llewyn, and I think many people will be able to relate to his battle between dreams and everyday reality.

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: